- The Supreme Court recognised the right to access and use the Internet as a fundamental right. The court held that it flows from Article 21 read with Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The ruling is a significant development for digital rights and internet freedom. It may guide future cases involving shutdowns, restrictions and online access. The judgment is expected to influence both policy and litigation.
- The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against the Bombay High Court order quashing the 2020 write-off of Yes Bank AT1 bonds. The court held that the administrator appointed during the government-backed rescue did not have the authority to extinguish the securities. Yes Bank has pegged the impact of the verdict at Rs 5,217 crore. The ruling is a major development for bondholders and banking-sector litigation. It may affect how future rescue and restructuring cases are handled.
- The Supreme Court discussed the potential of the Sahyog Portal to help identify and remove online material involving child sexual abuse. The discussion reflects the court’s focus on online child safety. The portal is being examined as a tool for faster identification and action. The matter is likely to see further hearings and directions. It highlights the growing role of technology in law enforcement and child protection.
- The Delhi High Court had earlier refused to stop the CJP protest at Connaught Place scheduled for October 16. The court considered arguments on the right to protest versus public order. It referred to earlier Supreme Court rulings on designated protest sites and road obstructions. The issue has since led to detentions and legal proceedings involving CJP leaders. The case continues to raise questions about protest rights in the capital.
- The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the YSRCP’s plea for more time in the Punganur Municipality election matter. The party had sought additional time citing alleged obstruction and violence. The dismissal means the poll process will proceed without extension. The YSRCP has decided not to contest the Punganur polls. The decision may lead to further legal and political action.
